Welcome Guest!!!

Thank you for visiting the GM Kappa Performance Forum. This forum is the only performance oriented forum for all GM Kappa Platform Enthusiasts.  We hope you will join and share your experiences.  Becoming a member is FREE! If you want to advertise on this forum, email KappaPerformance at yahoo.com.


Registration required to view the forum attachments. Below is a sample of the current top 25 topics.
Supporting Membership has many advantages.


More information on becoming a supporting member or vendor can be found on the sub forum; Site Help and Suggestions; thread - Supporting Members and Vendors.

Author Topic: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling  (Read 13153 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ben L

  • Guest
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #25 on: September 14, 2009, 07:44:59 AM »
 :agree:  No amount of rebound adjustment allows you to overcome the stiffness of the spring rates. 

Offline kennysabarese

  • "The Professor"
  • Premium Member
  • Gearhead
  • *
  • Posts: 3809
  • Karma: +0/-5
  • Location: NJ
  • Make or take?
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #26 on: September 14, 2009, 08:07:30 AM »
That's good to know. The good thing is you can put pretty much any spring you want on coilovers... The highways are really crap here in jersey...

After putting the z0k swaybars in, there is very little body roll, so maybe I can get away with a little softer spring...
2007 Sky Redline - Wester's Tuned - GMPP sensors - RMR Roll Bar - Kirkey Seats
Schroth Harnesses - SSR Wheels - Dunlop Direzza Z1 Star Specs - Complete Mod List
kennysabarese.com - Photos - Facebook - Twitter - RSS

Ben L

  • Guest
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #27 on: September 14, 2009, 08:21:33 AM »
I was able to order my BCs with other-than-their stock springs (6k/mm in front and 8k/mm in rear vs. 7k/mm BC stock), so you should be to get softer springs if you want. 

May be defeating the purpose for track driving though.  The stiffness comes in handy there; better/faster weight transfers, etc.

Offline Critterman

  • Retired, thank you very much
  • Premium Member
  • General Manager
  • *
  • Posts: 13700
  • Karma: +18/-58
  • Baltimore/Washington Corridor
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #28 on: September 14, 2009, 08:52:32 AM »
Jim,
I run mine at 7f/10r from the softest on the street, still good feel and she who must be obeyed doesn't complain
GONE: (but not forgotten) 2006 Cool named IXABEL (BISH-AH-BEL) Mayan for "Good Roads"
DDM StageIII intercooled Supercharger, Wisco ceramic coated pistons, Carrillo rods, superTech valves and Springs, Ported and polished head, Exedy Stage II Clutch,
big brake kit, slotted/drilled Rotors w/Porterfield pads & blue juice, Backbone, Probeam, Cross Strut Brace Underhood, trunk, & door Lights, ZOK suspension
JPM Center console, door inserts, & dash Seat bolster & lumbar support
Focuztech Tri-Y Header & hi-flow cat, Solo Performance SQR-2, Norm's Rear facia, Heated Seats, Blackface gau

Offline kennysabarese

  • "The Professor"
  • Premium Member
  • Gearhead
  • *
  • Posts: 3809
  • Karma: +0/-5
  • Location: NJ
  • Make or take?
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #29 on: September 14, 2009, 09:52:07 AM »
That's what i'm trying to learn here is what effect the 3 adjustable elements, springs, compression, rebound, have on comfort and performance. Since springs aren't easily adjustable, it would be nice to know if it is possible to get the best of both worlds.
2007 Sky Redline - Wester's Tuned - GMPP sensors - RMR Roll Bar - Kirkey Seats
Schroth Harnesses - SSR Wheels - Dunlop Direzza Z1 Star Specs - Complete Mod List
kennysabarese.com - Photos - Facebook - Twitter - RSS

Offline snaponbob

  • Gearhead
  • ****
  • Posts: 3655
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Location: Lee's Summit, Mo.
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #30 on: September 14, 2009, 03:28:17 PM »
SO much in this thread is correct and so much is not. WAY too much to cover it all. But ..................

1) Terminal understeer IS easier to correct than terminal oversteer. In either case, the nut behind the wheel screwed up !!!!
2) Some understeer IS nice to "live" with. The Kappas have SOME understeer -- in  street use.
3) SOME understeer is best in road racing or high speed conditions. MUCH more stable.
4) SOME neutral or oversteer is preferred in Solo type driving.
5) Chassis tune (other than alignment) is supposed to start with springs, THEN bars, THEN shock adjustments. Kappas come with SOFTER springs in front than rear, and without the bars would be loose. Kappas come with much stiffer bars in front than in back. (This is a matter of RIDE quality, not handling.) The bars induce the desired understeer that the supplied springs don't. If ONLY the springs were selected for handling, the avareage Kappa buyer would not like the harsher ride. Bars only marginally effect the ride.
6) Rebound (up to a point) will "control" springs, or rather what the springs DO when they uncoil. That is why more heavily spring cars have MORE rebound and LESS compression in the valving. Look at a car with worn out shocks that is oscillating up and down and you'll see what no rebound control does.
7) Once shocks, springs, and bars are selected and installed, (assuming tire pressures are set for best response) adding rebound at one end will induce TRANSITIONAL roll stiffness. Until the car has settled into its "steady state" in a given turn, more rebound in the front will cause tightening of a "loose" car or more understeer in a "tight" car.  Conversely, more rebound in the rear will free up a "tight" car, and oversteer in a "loose or neutral car. Rebound is the touchy stuff and can really screw up a well tuned suspension package if one is not careful. Example; are car handles great (for a given person, car, and setup) and someone increases the front compression. The driver will have a car that will turn in better, but then start to push. Lee Grimes of Koni warned me of this last year at Solo Nats when he revalved my shocks, and he was 100% correct. And playing with rebound in front or rear may make things worse. Quite the balancing act.
8) Of all the respondents in this thread, Ben has it about right ------ for autocross !!!!!!!! A well set up Solo car can be a wonderfull STREET driver, but nearly a death trap on a raod course!!!
9) If you have adjustable shocks, DON'T TOUCH the compression adjusters, but start playing with the rebound and see how the cars reacts. Even at modest speeds the feel will change. Set the rebound at mid positions on all four. Drive it with some reasonable gusto. Mentally note the feel. Now, turn the fronts 3/4 firm and the rears 3/4 soft. Repeat. Stop, set fronts 3/4 soft and the rears 3/4 firm. Repeat. Come back home and post the results to this thread !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
10) BTW, installed springs certainly CAN be used to change the handling if they are adjustable. In competition (race or solo) raising and lowering one end and/or the other WILL change the roll centers and how those ends "act". Also, preload matters !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There. That should toast a few folks, huh?  :gaah: :idiot: :banghead: :goat: ;)
Bob Buxbaum
snaponbob AT comcast DOT net
2007 Redline, Revalved Konis, Crazy alignment
FE3 front and Z0K rear bars, owner installed pwr lock buttons
catless downpipe, SP custom exhaustWester's tune
racing springs and adjustable perches
DDM ProBeam & Tower brace, CCW 18x11 wheels for racing

Offline Kelu

  • Premium Member
  • Shop Foreman
  • *
  • Posts: 6197
  • Karma: +8/-28
  • Location: Romania, Europe
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #31 on: September 14, 2009, 03:44:00 PM »
I must quote someone from the other forum:
"My head just exploded."  :lol:
Dragula  ;) Opel GT  from Romania
Arabas: take fotos, videos and keep all girls locked inside the house. Kelu's charm is irresistible !!!!

Ben L

  • Guest
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #32 on: September 14, 2009, 03:47:26 PM »
Good thing my GXP lacks roll protection, and will never see the track! 

Offline Treeman

  • Premium Member
  • Gearhead
  • *
  • Posts: 1677
  • Karma: +2/-2
  • Location: Scaggsville, MD
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #33 on: September 14, 2009, 09:38:56 PM »

8) Of all the respondents in this thread, Ben has it about right ------ for autocross !!!!!!!! A well set up Solo car can be a wonderfull STREET driver, but nearly a death trap on a raod course!!!

And that is probably one of the biggest differences between Ben and I.  I now enjoy autocross but my primary reason for owning the car is mountain twisties - more like a road course!  So, it is good to point out that there are different strokes for different folks.
2009 Aggressive GXP
DDM Race Backbone, ProBeam, Coil Cover, Alignment, and Oil Catch Can
Solo Mach Shorty Exhaust
GMPP Tune
LatinVenom Front Brace
Werks Adjustable Sway Bars
Michelin Pilot Super Sport Summers/Pirelli 240 Sottozero Winters
Sound Deadener Showdown
Beach Party Central Custom Fusebox Cover
JPM Arm Rests
Lead Foot!

Offline kennysabarese

  • "The Professor"
  • Premium Member
  • Gearhead
  • *
  • Posts: 3809
  • Karma: +0/-5
  • Location: NJ
  • Make or take?
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #34 on: September 15, 2009, 03:08:06 PM »
I gotta say since the body roll is pretty much gone with the rollbars. maybe i can put in softer springs, it certainly won't roll as much as stock...
2007 Sky Redline - Wester's Tuned - GMPP sensors - RMR Roll Bar - Kirkey Seats
Schroth Harnesses - SSR Wheels - Dunlop Direzza Z1 Star Specs - Complete Mod List
kennysabarese.com - Photos - Facebook - Twitter - RSS

Offline kennysabarese

  • "The Professor"
  • Premium Member
  • Gearhead
  • *
  • Posts: 3809
  • Karma: +0/-5
  • Location: NJ
  • Make or take?
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #35 on: September 15, 2009, 03:10:17 PM »
Of all the respondents in this thread, Ben has it about right ------ for autocross !!!!!!!! A well set up Solo car can be a wonderfull STREET driver, but nearly a death trap on a raod course!!!

Bob, FYI a month ago you told me that a street setup would be good on a road course r and that autocross is much different setup, which conflicts with the above statement.
2007 Sky Redline - Wester's Tuned - GMPP sensors - RMR Roll Bar - Kirkey Seats
Schroth Harnesses - SSR Wheels - Dunlop Direzza Z1 Star Specs - Complete Mod List
kennysabarese.com - Photos - Facebook - Twitter - RSS

Ben L

  • Guest
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #36 on: September 15, 2009, 04:59:34 PM »
I think its a matter of degree and personal preference. 

Big Daddy likes 'em tight and neutral, on the autox course, street or track. 

The part that is easiest to adjust is behind the wheel. 

If the platform is decent, and you learn car dynamics and what is going on, you can adapt your driving to the conditions.

Offline snaponbob

  • Gearhead
  • ****
  • Posts: 3655
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Location: Lee's Summit, Mo.
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #37 on: September 15, 2009, 05:04:09 PM »
Bob, FYI a month ago you told me that a street setup would be good on a road course r and that autocross is much different setup, which conflicts with the above statement.

Tru dat. Just driving around EITHER setup will work, and a Solo setup WILL feel a bit more agile. Driving HARD on the street (not recommended, but people do like to play) will reveal the true natural of the setup, and a road race setup favors neutral to modest understeer, while a Solo setup favors neutral to modest oversteer. HTH.
Bob Buxbaum
snaponbob AT comcast DOT net
2007 Redline, Revalved Konis, Crazy alignment
FE3 front and Z0K rear bars, owner installed pwr lock buttons
catless downpipe, SP custom exhaustWester's tune
racing springs and adjustable perches
DDM ProBeam & Tower brace, CCW 18x11 wheels for racing

Offline Critterman

  • Retired, thank you very much
  • Premium Member
  • General Manager
  • *
  • Posts: 13700
  • Karma: +18/-58
  • Baltimore/Washington Corridor
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #38 on: September 15, 2009, 07:50:33 PM »
I know that the one autox I drove, with the setup that was recommended to me, it was very easy to steer with the gas pedal, and at the same time very easy to control.  Very predictable and probably what I will run this weekend, unless it rains then I am leaving everything soft
GONE: (but not forgotten) 2006 Cool named IXABEL (BISH-AH-BEL) Mayan for "Good Roads"
DDM StageIII intercooled Supercharger, Wisco ceramic coated pistons, Carrillo rods, superTech valves and Springs, Ported and polished head, Exedy Stage II Clutch,
big brake kit, slotted/drilled Rotors w/Porterfield pads & blue juice, Backbone, Probeam, Cross Strut Brace Underhood, trunk, & door Lights, ZOK suspension
JPM Center console, door inserts, & dash Seat bolster & lumbar support
Focuztech Tri-Y Header & hi-flow cat, Solo Performance SQR-2, Norm's Rear facia, Heated Seats, Blackface gau

Offline Treeman

  • Premium Member
  • Gearhead
  • *
  • Posts: 1677
  • Karma: +2/-2
  • Location: Scaggsville, MD
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #39 on: September 15, 2009, 07:59:39 PM »
You will recall which end of my car gave out first at that one autocross!!  Not the front!
2009 Aggressive GXP
DDM Race Backbone, ProBeam, Coil Cover, Alignment, and Oil Catch Can
Solo Mach Shorty Exhaust
GMPP Tune
LatinVenom Front Brace
Werks Adjustable Sway Bars
Michelin Pilot Super Sport Summers/Pirelli 240 Sottozero Winters
Sound Deadener Showdown
Beach Party Central Custom Fusebox Cover
JPM Arm Rests
Lead Foot!

Offline Uranium-238

  • V8 power...Acquired!
  • Premium Member
  • Gearhead
  • *
  • Posts: 3038
  • Karma: +1/-1
  • Location: Southern Maryland
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #40 on: September 15, 2009, 08:10:08 PM »
I seem to recall that my Sky demonstrating an uncharacteristic amount oversteer on Sunday afternoon... :lol:
2005 Chevy Silverado Z71 Crew Cab, LM7 4L60E (What I traded my Kappa for. I regret nothing.)
2012 Chevy Camaro 2SS RS LS3 TR6060.
2021 Ram 2500 Cummins
2022 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon. 3.6, manual trans.

Offline Critterman

  • Retired, thank you very much
  • Premium Member
  • General Manager
  • *
  • Posts: 13700
  • Karma: +18/-58
  • Baltimore/Washington Corridor
Re: Soft or Hard - what's best for handling
« Reply #41 on: September 16, 2009, 10:36:46 AM »
You will recall which end of my car gave out first at that one autocross!!  Not the front!
  BUT - you have stock suspension and a zillion pounds or air in your tires!
GONE: (but not forgotten) 2006 Cool named IXABEL (BISH-AH-BEL) Mayan for "Good Roads"
DDM StageIII intercooled Supercharger, Wisco ceramic coated pistons, Carrillo rods, superTech valves and Springs, Ported and polished head, Exedy Stage II Clutch,
big brake kit, slotted/drilled Rotors w/Porterfield pads & blue juice, Backbone, Probeam, Cross Strut Brace Underhood, trunk, & door Lights, ZOK suspension
JPM Center console, door inserts, & dash Seat bolster & lumbar support
Focuztech Tri-Y Header & hi-flow cat, Solo Performance SQR-2, Norm's Rear facia, Heated Seats, Blackface gau

 

Powered by EzPortal