Welcome Guest!!!

Thank you for visiting the GM Kappa Performance Forum. This forum is the only performance oriented forum for all GM Kappa Platform Enthusiasts.  We hope you will join and share your experiences.  Becoming a member is FREE! If you want to advertise on this forum, email KappaPerformance at yahoo.com.


Registration required to view the forum attachments. Below is a sample of the current top 25 topics.
Supporting Membership has many advantages.


More information on becoming a supporting member or vendor can be found on the sub forum; Site Help and Suggestions; thread - Supporting Members and Vendors.

Author Topic: Tune comparisons  (Read 11106 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rich71

  • Master Tech
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Location: new york
Re: Tune comparisons
« Reply #25 on: May 19, 2009, 09:28:06 AM »
hahns ic quality is superb. you just need to trim the shroud and a little tweak of the mounting bolts and it goes right in. I am totally happy with it. I saw a marginal gain and has way more flow capability than you would ever need,even with a bigger turbo, but more importantly it is way less prone to heat saturation than the stock ic which is insubstantial to say the least when compared to hahns. I real nice piece and worth the investment.
2007 Midnight Blue Redline
Manual Trans
Westers Race Tune
Hahn Intercooler
GMPP Catback Exhaust
ReBar
DDM Race Backbone Brace
JPM Shifter
Sprint Booster
K&N Filter
Stubby Antenna
Redline overlay on 3rd brake light
BMW LiftPucks 4the BLIND

Offline LatinVenom

  • Premium Member
  • Gearhead
  • *
  • Posts: 3062
  • Karma: +7/-5
  • Location: South Florida
Re: Tune comparisons
« Reply #26 on: May 19, 2009, 03:37:47 PM »
If you have the Rebar you are all set, the ProBeam does the same thing, it's advantage over the Rebar is, it fits most exhaust.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2009, 06:57:03 PM by LatinVenom »
Solstice GXP 2007.
Aggressive and fully loaded.
Mods: Magnaflow 2.5" exhaust, DDM Backbone & ProBeam,ZOK suspension,LV Kappa Front Chassis Brace, BTF Turbo Upgraded Wheel, Windristrictor, JPM Center console,arms,tulip,side doors,DDM Upgraded wheel tune.

Offline sol_man

  • Premium Member
  • Master Tech
  • *
  • Posts: 255
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Location: Michigan.....
  • Enjoying the cool summer
Re: Tune comparisons
« Reply #27 on: May 20, 2009, 07:57:17 AM »
hahns ic quality is superb. you just need to trim the shroud and a little tweak of the mounting bolts and it goes right in. I am totally happy with it. I saw a marginal gain and has way more flow capability than you would ever need,even with a bigger turbo, but more importantly it is way less prone to heat saturation than the stock ic which is insubstantial to say the least when compared to hahns. I real nice piece and worth the investment.

Thanks Rich!  That will probably be on my short list!
Sly with premium-auto-spoiler-pedals-onstar-xm-monsoon-crome wheels-a/c-headliner.
BSR Tune / GM Performance Exhaust / Xenon fog lights / K&N drop in / Debadged
Best 1/4 - 13.12 @ 102.6 / 60 foot 1.9 seconds
0-60 in 4.37 seconds


lil goat

  • Guest
Re: Tune comparisons
« Reply #28 on: May 20, 2009, 08:56:00 AM »
I have always wanted to see the flow rating and pressure drop for the Hahn IC, I even asked Bill for it, never got the info. It seems to work well from what everyone has posted but these numbers are important. Lyndon Wester flowed and tested the Dejon IC and it has good numbers, you can have to big an IC, it will cool the charge very well but it can reduce boost by being to big or having to great a pressure drop. Lyndon offered to test the Hahn, if Bill paid shipping, no response from Bill.

 

Powered by EzPortal