Been away for a while.
Sorry you don't think much of my experience. As for setup, you have one tire that shows tremendous tire wear difference from one side to another. The camber was such that it clearly ran on that outside edge most of the time. You have another tire with excessive tire wear in the middle of the tire. That is typical of over inflation. I don't have a diagnosis for the sidewall separation but would not be surprised given the other 2 if it were under inflated. Any tire will fail if mistreated or driven beyond its design limit.
It is your sauce that looks weak to me and to discount my experience and call me and those I run with slow when you don't know me is even weaker. I am not Mario Andretti but I am not slow or ignorant.
Your experience doesn't mean much. As I said before, it is only a small part of the overall picture of experience out there. It's called the weight of evidence and it is basic logic. People should not draw conclusions from limited points of experience when there is much more information to draw upon to give a full picture, and consider. What you are doing is called cherrypicking the evidence, a basic logical fallacy. When looking at the overall evidence from user experience and reports, one does see some PSS issues at the track that were evaluated in detail and could not be explained by car issues. That is all and it's pretty straight forward.
You seem to not even bother reading those links. Surprising. Your "diagnoses" were all discussed and refuted in the links. The posters were not track newbies.. -3 degrees camber is not too little. And they were not under inflated. If you look closer at what you call an overinflated tire, you will see abnormal tire wear on the outside as well (the outer edge of the outer half of the treadblocks all show excessive wear), similar to the other pictures but much less track time. As those links discuss in detail, the sidewall is too soft for track driving if you are fast. It rolls over and leads to the uneven wear.
I find it rather childish to get offended by being called slow. As if an adult should get all upset if they aren't called a "fast" guy at the track. Too much ego out there. It is more childish to get offended when I never even called you slow. What I said is that there are fast and slow people out there. That's just a general reference. It's called the standard normal distribution bell curve. If one is not getting those shown tire issues they are not the of the fast track day drivers . Occam's razor leads me to that and what is a logical and reasonable conclusion from what evidence is available. Many people are not the fastest. I saw it all the time over years of road-racing, and many many track days. And it doesn't mean I called you slow.
When ever we ran autocross, we usually pump up the pressure because the standard pressure is for ride comfort, I usually ran 40 PSI for auto-x. I agree with Treeman, the alignment is out.
As I said, the info is in the links, the driver's were experienced track people and their car's had no issues with camber/alignment, etc., and they monitored tire pressues. There are other links where the OP had the same issues and checked his car alignment to find no issues as well. Since other tires he used before had not had those effects either, he moved on to other tires.
Having watched Treeman running the inner road course at Pocono International Raceway on those tires, I can tell you that he had no problem keeping up
That feedback means nothing. There is no reference point, or comparator to judge the outcome and interpret it. It adds nothing to the overall evaluation of the PSS at the track. There no doubt the PSS is a high performance tire. And one can go fast on them. But as posted and links, there are fast track guys have destroyed the PSS tires. It is not an extreme performance category tire (tirerack).
Those links to PSS tire issues are from drivers who've been on the track before, have used various tires before without said issues, and have set-up their car suspension for track HPDE. No one in those threads, let alone here has been able to show any car/driver issues as the cause that the owners did not account for in the discussion.... unless you ignore or disregard all the owner/car info and feedback in those threads. Which some people seem to be happy to do.
Such disregarding of the full information demonstrates confirmation bias (also called confirmatory bias or myside bias), which is the tendency of people to favor information that confirms their beliefs or hypotheses. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. I see some people very attached to their tire choice and the need for total validation.
