I don't think anyone here thought they were buying an expensive luxury car. We bought cheap, fun fast converts / coupes. If we really wanted fancy we would have bought fancy. Does that mean I think GM did the very best job they could have? No. But I didn't buy a Bently. What's that old saying? Cheap Fast Good - pick two?
Maybe I am spoiled, but the seats in the Kappas wouldn't pass muster for even the cheapest British sports cars of the 50s and 60s. Anyone turning out a seat with that quality of finish would have been out of a job.
Maybe I am one of only a few people with experience of quality leather seats and these seem acceptable to everyone else?
Of course I figured it was the beginning of the end when I recently sat in a friend's Jaguar and noted the fake wood on the dash!
I'm sure the stock leather seats will satisfy most people, but if you take a good look at the various redone leather seats for these cars, you can see real quality.
And I know the cars were built to a price and that compromises needed to be made (I would note that in the interior they are a bit more...compromised...than is the case in several other contemporary sports cars), and I am obviously willing to put up with these as I own the car and enjoy it.
If it is any consolation, I'm not happy with the Corvette interior either!
On the whole, I'd rather have at least decent cloth seats for $1000 less than unsatisfactory leather seats. If and when they die, I'll put the money into having soem really nice recovers done.
PS - of my list of currently owned cars in my sig, 6 out of 9, that is all but the two Pontiacs and one Britihs car, have leather seats, and the other, the race car, has had leather replaced with a competition Recaro that really holds you in place, with cloth cover.