I have to fess up with being the person who helped to start this mess - although it did not go where I thought. I am a newbie - to the forum and with a new Solstice - and was trying to learn more about the backbone. I saw the thread about how wonderful it is and then saw the debate about whether it transfers stress to other points in the car that may not be designed to handle it. Once I got the blessing to post on the other forum, where Flash's Owner is, I PM'd him asking about the transfer of stress to the other parts of the chassis. Figured he should know about that for sure. He blew that off pretty quick as a non-issue (yea!) but then questioned the whole thing and shared his experience blind testing the Z0K stuff. I sent him links to threads on that forum and here (hoped to attract him over here) and suggested he publicly post. He said he had gotten enough questions he would and did.
Look guys. I was not questioning your manhood or your experiences. I thought bringing Flash's Owner in to the discussion, we might learn something and have a fun chat. How often do we get to chat with the designer of a car we drive?? I think the discussion over there may be changing his mind. I was hoping to get him to join us too.
I don't autocross or go on the track and don't intend to. I bought my car as a daily driver that I can have fun with on local curvy roads and get to the mountains when my kids soccer and baseball schedules let me. I love it, drive fast (don't know what "hard" really means - my guess is something different to everyone), and have a good time. I don't jack up my car by one corner and I don't drive a Cobra. I don't even have the GMPP tune yet, but plan to get it (if I can). I know about the weaknesses of convertibles but this was one designed with that in mind - the whole reason we have the tunnel if the first place. It is similar to the Corvette design (interesting side thought - do they need to add backbones?).
Some of the points of view here are from those that have really souped up your cars. I love souped up cars but I'm not doing that with this one. Some, like the post above, are more for folks like me (hope you agree TerryT). I'd like to hear both experiences - I have learned alot.
Unfortunately, most folks who have the backbone also have the probeam. Kinda to Flash's Owner's point about do you need both - hard to tell. But from this thread and the one on the other forum, I have decided that if I go that route, I will get both because the backbone seems to be a cheap, easy mod and at least does no harm and may help a lot.
I am curious though about the thoughts of doing the DDM route versus Z0K. I get the picture that DDM is the cheaper, easier mod. But Flash's Owner makes a big point about the attachment points on the Z0K rear crossmember piece versus the ProBeam. What do folks think?
Sorry about the long post...I'll hush now and drive.
