Author Topic: Aluminum or Cast Iron  (Read 6140 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dan Furr

  • Apprentice/Gofer
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Karma: +0/-0
Aluminum or Cast Iron
« on: June 27, 2010, 08:34:57 PM »
Which is better ? I know the aluminum is lighter...............


                        The truck 4.8 and 5.3's are cast iron .....why? :huh:

Offline Sly Bob

  • Administrators
  • Shop Foreman
  • *
  • Posts: 8077
  • Karma: +19/-10
  • My new grandson
    • Kappa Performance Forum
Re: Aluminum or Cast Iron
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2010, 09:02:42 PM »
Not for much longer. With the mileage requirements going forward, all engines including the truck engines will be aluminum.

There was, in the past, the perception that the cast iron was better and the manufacturers continued to build cast iron engines on the same equipment that they have for years. Those plants and those processes are falling by the wayside as more technology and lighter materials are being incorporated into modern powertrains.
Just trying to do my part...

Mods: Lose the chicklets, VentureShield, Dual horns, AfterShock spoiler, Weathershield cover, Lil Chromies, Red calipers with black Solstice stickers, Opel GT antenna and Solo GXP-RCD exhaust with a Solo hi-flow cat!

Offline Uranium-238

  • V8 power...Acquired!
  • Premium Member
  • Gearhead
  • *
  • Posts: 3038
  • Karma: +1/-1
Re: Aluminum or Cast Iron
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2010, 09:03:52 PM »
In general, cast iron blocks are more durable and better if you want to make crazy power. Aluminum isn't as tough, more susceptible to issues after overheating, etc. In a truck, where weight isn't the primary concern, cast iron is usually the preferred choice. Many serious race engines are also cast iron.
2005 Chevy Silverado Z71 Crew Cab, LM7 4L60E (What I traded my Kappa for. I regret nothing.)
2012 Chevy Camaro 2SS RS LS3 TR6060.
2021 Ram 2500 Cummins
2022 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon. 3.6, manual trans.

Offline Dan Furr

  • Apprentice/Gofer
  • *
  • Posts: 9
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Aluminum or Cast Iron
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2010, 09:12:18 PM »
Thanks guys..............that's about what I figured..............but I needed to know..............

     I got away from car-fun for many years........... :(

     NOw my grandson has me loving cars again! :)

     But things have changed a lot , since the 60's. :huh:


     I had a family-car for 10 years in the eighties, put 120,000 miles on it,  and never raised the hood, not once! :lol:

  But my Solstice has cured that!........... :cool:


    
« Last Edit: June 27, 2010, 09:20:57 PM by Dan Furr »

Offline JimmyBaja

  • Premium Member
  • Gearhead
  • *
  • Posts: 1147
  • Karma: +0/-1
Re: Aluminum or Cast Iron
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2010, 10:17:32 PM »
My '08 GMC truck I traded for the Sol had the 5.3L with a cast iron block but had aluminum heads - I guess maybe the best of both worlds.

Offline kennysabarese

  • "The Professor"
  • Premium Member
  • Gearhead
  • *
  • Posts: 3809
  • Karma: +0/-5
  • Make or take?
Re: Aluminum or Cast Iron
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2010, 10:56:33 AM »
Someone else has made more power than you with the engine you are looking at getting. If they can make more than the power you want with aluminum, then your questions are answered.

2007 Sky Redline - Wester's Tuned - GMPP sensors - RMR Roll Bar - Kirkey Seats
Schroth Harnesses - SSR Wheels - Dunlop Direzza Z1 Star Specs - Complete Mod List
kennysabarese.com - Photos - Facebook - Twitter - RSS

Offline Rogue

  • Premium Member
  • Master Tech
  • *
  • Posts: 685
  • Karma: +2/-1
Re: Aluminum or Cast Iron
« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2010, 11:23:31 AM »
The cast iron blocks maintain their dimensional tolerances under stress much better than the aluminum. If you look at the serious high HP racers who use forced induction, CI is the runaway preferred material.
Go N.A.K.3.D..

Offline snaponbob

  • Gearhead
  • ****
  • Posts: 3655
  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Aluminum or Cast Iron
« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2010, 03:17:00 PM »
If you are considering a V8 swap, I would think that aluminum is the only way to go. ADDING power to a V8 Kappa is nearly useless, as USING the power already available in a V8 would be enough of a challenge !!!!  The weight penalty for a cast iron small block Chevy would be awful.
Bob Buxbaum
snaponbob AT comcast DOT net
2007 Redline, Revalved Konis, Crazy alignment
FE3 front and Z0K rear bars, owner installed pwr lock buttons
catless downpipe, SP custom exhaustWester's tune
racing springs and adjustable perches
DDM ProBeam & Tower brace, CCW 18x11 wheels for racing

Offline Uranium-238

  • V8 power...Acquired!
  • Premium Member
  • Gearhead
  • *
  • Posts: 3038
  • Karma: +1/-1
Re: Aluminum or Cast Iron
« Reply #8 on: June 28, 2010, 03:21:08 PM »
If you are considering a V8 swap, I would think that aluminum is the only way to go. ADDING power to a V8 Kappa is nearly useless, as USING the power already available in a V8 would be enough of a challenge !!!!  The weight penalty for a cast iron small block Chevy would be awful.

Agreed. The only way you can justify a cast iron V8 in one of our cars is if you're making the car into an all-out dragster. (By all-out I'm implying a roll cage, tubbed rear wheels, racing transmission and gears, and so on.)
2005 Chevy Silverado Z71 Crew Cab, LM7 4L60E (What I traded my Kappa for. I regret nothing.)
2012 Chevy Camaro 2SS RS LS3 TR6060.
2021 Ram 2500 Cummins
2022 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon. 3.6, manual trans.

Offline werks

  • Vendor
  • Master Tech
  • *
  • Posts: 514
  • Karma: +4/-100
Re: Aluminum or Cast Iron
« Reply #9 on: December 03, 2010, 07:11:25 PM »
Aluminum for sure!!!  The hey to going fast is power to weight!!!
Dave Gilbert
Performance Autowerks, Inc.
Phone - 815-439-4547
Fax - 815-439-6751
WERKS MAX Power Solstice GXP LNF - "50 Trim" WERKs turbo - 109 Octane - 415whp/428ftlbs
Anthony's SKY Redline LNF - GT35R - 93 Octane/Water/Meth - 442whp/414ftlbs
Ricky's Solstice LE5 '50 trim" WERKS turbo - 93 Octane/Water/Meth - 374whp/358ftlbs
Matt's Cobalt SS LNF Billet 55/57 WERKs turbo - 93 Octane - 442whp/450ftlbs
www.performanceautowerks.com
info@performanceautowerks.com