With people solving the fuel delivery issue with a 5th injector, why is the pump still being looked at?
I'm personally looking at the pump as it mimics the OEM design. I don't like the thought of not getting good mixing through a 5th injector (not saying it doesn't mix well, but saying I don't know how well it does mix). If I push the fuel through the HP fuel rail, I know what I get.
We all need to remember there are several different end goals from people in this thread:
Fuel: 1) Gasoline, 2) E85, 3) E85/gas blends
Path to take: 1) Any, 2) Limited by SCCA racing rules
I belong to the Fuel #2 or #3, and Path #2. Others have different limitations / wants. So... you'll see people respond with their fuel/path intended, but not always will it be yours, so their answers / comments seem "odd" at times.
I'm aware of a multitude of ways to increase the fuel to the engine:
1) 5th injector
2) Modified fuel lobe on the cam
3) Increased volume output of a HPFP
#1 is available today, and as this thread talks about in various methods.
#2 is available today, but not legal per my SCCA rules I'm limited to for racing
#3 is what I want to complete... because this solution solves *everyones* fuel/path choices
Remember when people talk hp limitation we need to understand their fuel of choice as well. Running E85 I can not keep the engine supplied. Running a blend (50/50 E85/Gasoline) I've had zero issues. I'm looking to up my ratio to understand where I see issues, and if I see performance gains. I do know there is a difference between E85 and a 50/50 blend E85/Gasoline... I have dyno plots to show that, what I don't have is the various points between those two end points, and I don't know how linear (or non-linear) those changes are between the two data points.
Last I heard from BOSCH (two months ago) there isn't a HPFP which flows more fuel than what is in our LNF setup. The engineering prints I've been provided by BOSCH show the same internal volume on the pumps, and change out the plunger / spring assembly for various model numbers. Each is capable of providing the same max volume per stroke.
With that said... there are only two ways to get more fuel (per RPM) than stock:
1) Make the HPFP volume larger (open the pump, bore it out, and put it back together)
2) Cycle the pump more than 3 times per RPM
Option #1 is SCCA legal (yeah for me and SnapOnBob). Option #2 is not SCCA legal (and from my discussions at Lincoln last month doesn't appear it will become legal either).
There's my attempt at why some people want different solutions, and a summary of the possibilities (as I currently understand them). Increasing the pump output per stroke is the solution which is possible (done today on turbo DI VW setups via two speed shops in the U.S.A.), and SCCA legal. It just so happens to enable either fuel type as well. That's why I see it as the "ultimate" end goal.
